in ,

In Lisbon for review: KEF’s Q Concerto Meta

  • If you think you’re seeing double it’s because you are. We’ve already previewed KEF’s new Q Concerto Meta in Berlin (US$1299/pair) so why are we doing it again a month later and almost 3000km away in Lisbon?

    The answer: the quest for helpful side-by-side comparisons.

    Long-time readers will know of my aversion to comparisons pulled across time windows unable to support them; audio memory is too fragile and the audible differences between components too small to reliably compare a loudspeaker I have in front of me with one that was here a few weeks ago but is now back with the manufacturer.

    Similarly, I will not compare a loudspeaker in my listening room to one heard at a hi-fi show earlier in the year. My job would be much easier if I did but at what informational cost to you, dear reader?

    The side-by-side comparisons for the Q Concerto Meta in Berlin were easy to sort: the GoldenEar BRX (US$1600/pair) and the Zu DWX in its Supreme incarnation and Ruby Red Hickory finish (US$2400/pair). ‘Easy’ because they were the only price-commensurate loudspeakers I had to hand. I work from home where storage space is limited and tough choices need to be made about what stays and what goes — and on an ongoing basis. One of those tough choices was ejecting KEF’s R3 Meta (via an eBay sale) long before the Q Concerto had been announced. D’oh!

    But I still had a pair of R3 Meta in Lisbon, which planted the seed…

    What if I were to conduct the second half of the Q Concerto Meta review in Portugal? That would delay its publication but give me the double benefit of 1) hearing the Q Concerto Meta in two different acoustically-treated listening rooms and 2) conducting a side-by-side comparison with the twice as expensive R3 Meta (€2200/pair).

    There’d be one obvious wrinkle: requesting a second pair of Q Concerto Meta from KEF would stretch the relationship. I’d have to buy that second pair (albeit at trade pricing). Why not opt for a different colour? I have the walnut finish in Berlin so I went for the white in Lisbon. KEF has carried over the vinyl-wrap finish from the outgoing Q Series to the new Q Meta range to better assist home theatre enthusiasts looking to mix ‘n match.

    Another wrinkle: KEF’s matching SQ1 loudspeaker stands (€299/pair) aren’t yet available in Portugal. I’d have to press the more stylish but costlier Solid Steel SS6 (€499/pair) back into service.

    However, with the price differential between the Q and R3 so wide, I would need a more affordable loudspeaker for the review’s fourth and final side-by-side comparison. I considered buying a pair of KEF’s LS50 Meta but that would mean three KEF loudspeakers doing long-term service in my Lisbon pad. Variety won out and I purchased a pair of Wharfedale Linton in black with their matching stands (€1299).

    And then a final wrinkle: with me in Lisbon and Olaf tied up with his studies in Hamburg, I would have to – for the first time – shoot a significant portion of the video’s b-roll myself. Specifically, the Wharfedale vs. KEF and KEF vs. KEF plus the music used for those side-by-side comparisons. That music would come from Robyn Hitchcock, Neil Young, Prefab Sprout, Global Communication, Orbital, New Order, Aphex Twin and Placebo (among others) — entire albums and EPs and all of them on physical formats. Both side-by-side comparisons would be level-matched and each one would be conducted over a two week period.

    All of this decision-making took place a month ago. The side-by-side comparisons are now in the bag and the b-roll shot to leave the final review video no more than a week away.

    Further information: KEF

    Written by John Darko

    John currently lives in Berlin where he creates videos and podcasts for Darko.Audio. He has previously contributed to 6moons, TONEAudio, AudioStream and Stereophile.

    Follow John on YouTube or Instagram

    More information on Marantz’s SACD 10 and Link 10n

    FiiO’s BTR 17 offers aptX Lossless & ‘Desktop Mode’