in ,

AURALiC announce Lightning ARIES USB audio streamer

  • If you’re using a standard-ish PC or Mac to feed your DAC direct with USB audio then chances are you’ll be listening to an audio stream tainted by jitter and electrical noise; it’ll probably sound tonally bleached and lacking in dynamic muscle. A USB-S/PDIF converter will cure some of these ills with the best in budget class being the Audiophilleo2 and Resonessence Labs Concero (HD).

    The inconvenient truth about the Logitech Squeezebox Touch is that its S/PDIF output sounds similarly grey and diluted. Prior to the advent of triode’s Enhanced Digital Output you’d have needed Empirical Audio’s SynchroMesh to lift its game. However, the EDO’s reversal of the Squeezebox Touch’s USB port from input to output sees users enjoying re-clocking from the aforementioned USB-S/PDIF converters – far superior to connecting most DACs directly to the SBT over USB. Fact is, there are FAR more USB reclockers on the market than there are S/PDIF reclockers. Steve Nugent’s SynchroMesh leads a field of (almost) one.

    With USB ruling the reclocking roost, manufacturers turning their heads to digital audio streamers should ensure their product’s S/PDIF output is low in noise and jitter…or else go home. A new streaming solution needs to best the gold standard of a (used) Logitech Squeezebox Touch + Emprical Audio SynchroMesh.

    AURALiC have this week announced that they’ll be debuting their new Lightning ARIES streamer at CES 2014, with more models in the Lightning arriving down the line. Audiostream’s Michael Lavorgna has already jumped on the ARIES’ ability to stream DSD/DXD over dual-band 802.11ac Gigabit wifi which is all fine and dandy if you possess such source material on your NAS or computer hard drive.

    Lifted direct from the press release:

    “ARIES, the first product in the Lightning family, serves as a bridge between music on network storage and DACs, enabling DACs to stream music quickly and superbly via Wi-Fi in virtually any format, including DSD, double-rate DSD and DXD. ARIES includes a switchable USB host output; digital AES/EBU, coaxial and Toslink connections driven by AURALiC’s patented ActiveUSB technology; and an extremely accurate Femto Master Clock.”

    However, for me, the ARIES’ killer feature is its USB output. It can stream up to 32bit/384kHz PCM and double rate DSD over the air and then push it into your DAC over USB. Why so cool? You can BYO USB-S/PDIF conversion (should you so wish).

    The other knockout feature is one that much of the competition glosses over: gapless playback. As I’ve argued previously, gapless should be standard on ALL music streamers and not thought of by manufacturers as some kind of digital audio nicety.

    Here’s the skinny on the Lightning product family’s tech specs:

    “The Lightning is based on AURALiC’s proprietary Telsa hardware platform. The new Telsa platform includes a quad-core ARM Coretex-A9 processor running at 1GHz, 2GB DDR3 onboard memory, and dual-band 802.11ac Gigabit Wi-Fi infrastructure. The brand-new Telsa platform enables a 25,000 MIPS calculating capability compared to 1,000 MIPS for AURALiC’s previous platform, named Sanctuary.”


    Remote control will come from custom AURALiC apps with versions planned for iOS, Android, Windows, Mac OS X and Linux.

    Playback from streaming services such as Spotify will also be supported.

    The ARIES streamer will be available from May 2014 with an RRP of US$999.

    Further information: AURALiC Lightning ARIES press release

    [Photos to come as soon as I have ’em]

    John H. Darko

    Written by John H. Darko

    John is the editor of Darko.Audio, from whose ad revenues he derives an income. He is an occasional contributor to 6moons but has previously written pieces for TONEAudio, AudioStream and Stereophile.

    Darko.Audio is a member of EISA.

    Follow John on YouTube or Twitter


    1. This is a contraption I’ve been waiting for. One more of its killer features (at least, in my opinion) is an ability to on-board playlist creation – something that other manufacturers don’t seem to recognize as a must-have function. I couldn’t live without it.

    2. Finally, and company (and author) who takes gapless seriously!! All my tech-house mixes/podcasts will collectively bro-fist when they get word of this.

    3. Lots of simplistic thinking here… There is NO WAY that the Touch used wirelessly as a USB digital output is any ware near ‘ideal’. I have a Transporter sitting in the corner – reason – wireless is noisy as shit. There are PLENTY of USB to SPDIF converters that outperform the old squeezebox protocols (ex – ULink from wyred4snd) – IMHO!

      • But that was my point: USB output on the Touch means USB converters *can* be deployed.

    4. The USB output is definitely interesting. Sonore’s Rendu already does everything else this thing does including DSD (assuming you add a wireless ethernet bridge, anyway) but its output is either S/Pdif or I2S using the HDMI spec which limits it to a tiny handful of DACs.

      What will make or break this thing is the software. The other issue with the Rendu is that it relies on third party software, most of which is not very good. If they have endless bugs like PS had with eLyric, it’s not going to turn out well, not when you can build a VortexBox for a few hundred bucks.

    5. The emergence of these options is making my head hurt. In a good way. Any thoughts on what the trade offs might be between the ‘traditional’ “Mac ‘n DAC” model and the streamer centric topology?

      Are these two approaches a question of quality vs convenience ?
      Are there benefits in terms of simpler and cheaper systems?
      Does this spell the end of the PC based music server?

      • Absolutely NOT the end of the PC based music server. Traditional “Mac n DAC” (I like that!) model isn’t as good using more specialised music servers. I have an Antipodes DS which really highlights the audio weaknesses of the Apple computer. Review on that to come later this month. You’ve hit the nail on the head though: there’s often a trade off between SQ and usability.

    6. Hi, John,

      I am not questioning your opinion on the inferiority of the MacMini-based system (including a DAC, of course), but have you tried the MojoAudio modified MacMini, or was that a “plain vanilla” MacMini that you were comparing to the Antipodes DS?

      BTW, I am very eager to see your review of the Antipodes box. I’ve been having difficulty to choose between MojoAudio MacMini and the Antipodes DS. Now, with the upcoming Auralic Aries, I am even more undecided…

      • Alas, not tried the Mojo, sorry. One of the things I like about the Antipodes is its headless Linux o/s. Once you get used to MPD and its clients it’s much faster than MacMini w/ iTunes and Audirvana+. Sound is A LOT better too.

    Audeze LCD-XC headphones review

    NAD D 3020 review (Part 1 – vs. NAD 3020i)